PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.63%
Revenue decline while CRWV shows 23.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-39.80%
Cost reduction while CRWV shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.58%
Gross profit decline while CRWV shows 25.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.02%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 1.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-48.23%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
237.05%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-21.85%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWV shows 248.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.40%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-9.00%
Total costs reduction while CRWV shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.00%
D&A reduction while CRWV shows 26.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.36%
EBITDA decline while CRWV shows 33.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.92%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.36%
Operating income decline while CRWV shows 169.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.12%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
19.59%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.43%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWV shows 9.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.08%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 26.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.34%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-15.11%
Net income decline while CRWV shows 7.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.06%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.39%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.