PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.73%
Similar revenue growth to CRWV's 23.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
36.80%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWV's 19.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
14.29%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of CRWV's 25.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-2.92%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.17%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-44.43%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
29.04%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.33%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWV shows 17.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.57%
Total costs growth less than half of CRWV's 18.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.98%
D&A reduction while CRWV shows 26.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
35.92%
Similar EBITDA growth to CRWV's 33.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
10.99%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 7.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
35.92%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.45%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
50.54%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.00%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 9.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
16.37%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of CRWV's 26.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
37.03%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
36.99%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
16.36%
Net margin growth 50-75% of CRWV's 25.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
39.13%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
39.13%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.