PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.62%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.45%
Cost growth less than half of CRWV's 19.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
5.98%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.34%
Margin expansion below 50% of CRWV's 1.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.14%
R&D change of 12.14% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWV shows 248.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.92%
Similar operating expenses growth to CRWV's 17.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
14.00%
Similar total costs growth to CRWV's 18.28%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.21%
EBITDA decline while CRWV shows 33.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.43%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.21%
Operating income decline while CRWV shows 169.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.99%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
75.81%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.94%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWV's 9.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.24%
Tax expense reduction while CRWV shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
44.36%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.68%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 25.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
41.67%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
47.83%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.99%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.00%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.