PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.01%
Revenue growth 50-75% of CRWV's 23.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
113.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWV's 19.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.12%
Gross profit decline while CRWV shows 25.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.63%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.34%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.59%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
36.88%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.43%
Similar operating expenses growth to CRWV's 17.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
43.13%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWV's 18.28%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.59%
D&A growth above 1.5x CRWV's 26.15%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-22.40%
EBITDA decline while CRWV shows 33.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.32%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.40%
Operating income decline while CRWV shows 169.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.11%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.27%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.52%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWV shows 9.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.94%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.57%
Tax expense reduction while CRWV shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.50%
Net income decline while CRWV shows 7.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.92%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.86%
EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.71%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.24%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.