PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.87%
Revenue decline while CRWV shows 23.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.16%
Cost reduction while CRWV shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.37%
Gross profit decline while CRWV shows 25.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.54%
Margin expansion below 50% of CRWV's 1.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.57%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-19.09%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-21.85%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWV shows 248.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-23.81%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-14.24%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWV shows 17.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.78%
Total costs reduction while CRWV shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.67%
Interest expense reduction while CRWV shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.95%
D&A reduction while CRWV shows 26.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.08%
EBITDA decline while CRWV shows 33.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.48%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 7.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
4.30%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.99%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.28%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWV's 9.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.97%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 26.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.36%
Tax expense reduction while CRWV shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.62%
Net income growth 50-75% of CRWV's 7.67%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
13.41%
Net margin growth 50-75% of CRWV's 25.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
6.78%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.08%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.07%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.