PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.33%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 23.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
61.75%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWV's 19.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
21.02%
Similar gross profit growth to CRWV's 25.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-8.55%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.69%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.27%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
29.63%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-238.75%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
16.71%
Similar operating expenses growth to CRWV's 17.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
35.71%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWV's 18.28%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.41%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
32.18%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x CRWV's 26.15%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
10.04%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWV's 33.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.47%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.81%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.92%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-222.97%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.94%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 9.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-7.09%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.40%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
25.06%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.49%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.40%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
25.81%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.46%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.