PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.12%
Revenue decline while CRWV shows 23.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.49%
Cost reduction while CRWV shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.47%
Gross profit decline while CRWV shows 25.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.56%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.27%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-14.78%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-15.85%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWV shows 248.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-2425.00%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.38%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWV shows 17.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.65%
Total costs reduction while CRWV shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.81%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of CRWV's 1.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-2.14%
D&A reduction while CRWV shows 26.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
36306.25%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 33.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.12%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
382.17%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 169.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
407.11%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 156.60%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-194.28%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
413.95%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 9.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
441.70%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 26.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-57.54%
Tax expense reduction while CRWV shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
253.43%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
266.99%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 25.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
252.50%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
252.50%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.81%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.29%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.