PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.77%
Revenue growth 50-75% of CRWV's 23.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
36.98%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWV's 19.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.71%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.47%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.09%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-4.24%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
18.81%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
84.95%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWV's 19.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
7.03%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
21.83%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x CRWV's 18.28%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
24.10%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
5.68%
D&A growth less than half of CRWV's 26.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
4.02%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWV's 33.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.64%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.02%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.92%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.93%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.20%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of CRWV's 9.63%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-9.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
36.99%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
2.37%
Net income growth below 50% of CRWV's 7.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.33%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.28%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.64%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.40%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.41%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.