PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.40%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.33%
Cost growth less than half of CRWV's 19.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-1.36%
Gross profit decline while CRWV shows 25.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.76%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.57%
R&D change of 5.57% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
14.12%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
17.38%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
20.41%
Similar other expenses growth to CRWV's 19.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
12.21%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of CRWV's 17.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.71%
Total costs growth less than half of CRWV's 18.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.47%
Interest expense growth 1.1-1.25x CRWV's 1.19%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
11.89%
D&A growth less than half of CRWV's 26.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
6.04%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWV's 33.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.03%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.70%
Operating income decline while CRWV shows 169.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.93%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
208.10%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-33.54%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWV shows 9.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.81%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-82.42%
Tax expense reduction while CRWV shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.88%
Net income decline while CRWV shows 7.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.21%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.02%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.67%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.70%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.