PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.78%
Similar revenue growth to CRWV's 23.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
26.22%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 19.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
13.07%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of CRWV's 25.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-3.99%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.42%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-15.89%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
26.76%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-1046.67%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.83%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
17.80%
Similar total costs growth to CRWV's 18.28%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
19.22%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
19.27%
D&A growth 50-75% of CRWV's 26.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
18.05%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of CRWV's 33.05%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-1.30%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.72%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.05%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.46%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.50%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 9.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.29%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
10.59%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-6.10%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.96%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.44%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.58%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.