PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.91%
Cost growth less than half of CRWV's 19.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while CRWV shows 25.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.36%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.74%
R&D change of 4.74% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
12.73%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
12.50%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
42.50%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWV's 19.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
9.44%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of CRWV's 17.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.23%
Total costs growth less than half of CRWV's 18.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.55%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-4.48%
D&A reduction while CRWV shows 26.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.90%
EBITDA decline while CRWV shows 33.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.31%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.72%
Operating income decline while CRWV shows 169.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.08%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-370.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-21.84%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWV shows 9.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.20%
Tax expense reduction while CRWV shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.72%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
18.19%
Net margin growth 50-75% of CRWV's 25.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
18.31%
Similar EPS growth to CRWV's 23.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
18.57%
Similar diluted EPS growth to CRWV's 23.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.