PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-2.11%
Cost reduction while CRWV shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.41%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.97%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 1.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.71%
R&D change of 1.71% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-13.95%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-12.49%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWV shows 248.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-69.57%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.30%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWV shows 17.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.81%
Total costs reduction while CRWV shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.60%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
6.66%
D&A growth less than half of CRWV's 26.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
19.48%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of CRWV's 33.05%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
27.09%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
44.62%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
37.42%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
127.46%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
43.99%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 9.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.82%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 26.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
245.45%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
0.97%
Net income growth below 50% of CRWV's 7.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.06%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.19%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.20%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.09%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.