PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.85%
Similar revenue growth to CRWV's 23.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
33.66%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWV's 19.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.80%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.83%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.96%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-4.89%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
19.67%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
187.18%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWV's 19.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
7.28%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
20.26%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x CRWV's 18.28%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
3.87%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
1.48%
D&A growth less than half of CRWV's 26.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
9.88%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWV's 33.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.07%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.60%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.46%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
77.54%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.84%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 9.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.55%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
998.79%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-195.83%
Net income decline while CRWV shows 7.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-181.32%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-196.47%
EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-197.62%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.03%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-1.14%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.