PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.26%
Revenue decline while CRWV shows 23.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.22%
Cost reduction while CRWV shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.70%
Gross profit decline while CRWV shows 25.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.99%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 1.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.02%
R&D change of 6.02% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
8.93%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-4.98%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWV shows 248.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-79.41%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.90%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-8.46%
Total costs reduction while CRWV shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.00%
Interest expense reduction while CRWV shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.86%
D&A growth less than half of CRWV's 26.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-1.90%
EBITDA decline while CRWV shows 33.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.04%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to CRWV's 7.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-4.46%
Operating income decline while CRWV shows 169.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.02%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-28.78%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.76%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWV shows 9.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.62%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 26.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-92.13%
Tax expense reduction while CRWV shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
217.80%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
227.02%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 25.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
217.07%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
215.85%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
1.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.