PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.18%
Revenue growth 50-75% of CRWV's 23.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
5.10%
Cost growth less than half of CRWV's 19.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
15.91%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of CRWV's 25.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
3.33%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 1.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.87%
R&D change of 5.87% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
5.22%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
9.80%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-971.43%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.63%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.36%
Total costs growth less than half of CRWV's 18.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.75%
Interest expense reduction while CRWV shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.16%
D&A reduction while CRWV shows 26.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
26.05%
Similar EBITDA growth to CRWV's 33.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-1.24%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.17%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.58%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.75%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
23.60%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 9.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.18%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 26.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
48.48%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
19.52%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.54%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.79%
Similar EPS growth to CRWV's 23.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
20.00%
Similar diluted EPS growth to CRWV's 23.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.19%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.24%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.