PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.65%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
25.42%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 19.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
4.53%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.37%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.34%
R&D change of 2.34% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-1.48%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
11.96%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
142.86%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWV's 19.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
6.14%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
16.12%
Similar total costs growth to CRWV's 18.28%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-0.30%
Interest expense reduction while CRWV shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.57%
D&A growth less than half of CRWV's 26.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
3.60%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWV's 33.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.08%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.04%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.70%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.60%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWV's 9.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.99%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.66%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-4.58%
Net income decline while CRWV shows 7.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.53%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.22%
EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.25%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.