PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.85%
Revenue decline while CRWV shows 23.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.14%
Cost reduction while CRWV shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.76%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.09%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 1.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.04%
R&D change of 6.04% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
4.15%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-0.50%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWV shows 248.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-52.94%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.76%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-8.93%
Total costs reduction while CRWV shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.15%
Interest expense reduction while CRWV shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.30%
D&A reduction while CRWV shows 26.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.11%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWV's 33.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.91%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to CRWV's 7.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.81%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.07%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.17%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.97%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWV's 9.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.25%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 26.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.66%
Tax expense reduction while CRWV shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.62%
Net income growth 50-75% of CRWV's 7.67%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
11.12%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.50%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.26%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.