PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.29%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.38%
Cost growth less than half of CRWV's 19.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
14.23%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of CRWV's 25.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
3.58%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 1.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.56%
R&D change of 4.56% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
20.87%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
8.70%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-856.25%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.35%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.35%
Total costs growth less than half of CRWV's 18.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.30%
Interest expense reduction while CRWV shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.07%
D&A reduction while CRWV shows 26.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.02%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of CRWV's 33.05%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
3.45%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 7.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.96%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.77%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
31.72%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.12%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 9.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.91%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 26.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-135.24%
Tax expense reduction while CRWV shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
49.70%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
35.73%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 25.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
49.57%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 23.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.22%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.18%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.