PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.96%
Revenue decline while CRWV shows 23.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.06%
Cost reduction while CRWV shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.81%
Gross profit decline while CRWV shows 25.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.87%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.15%
R&D change of 1.15% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-25.54%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-12.60%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWV shows 248.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
85.12%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWV's 19.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-8.60%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWV shows 17.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.42%
Total costs reduction while CRWV shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.78%
Interest expense reduction while CRWV shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.61%
D&A growth less than half of CRWV's 26.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-3.29%
EBITDA decline while CRWV shows 33.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.86%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of CRWV's 7.69%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
2.27%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.31%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.71%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWV's 9.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.73%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 26.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
439.76%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-19.03%
Net income decline while CRWV shows 7.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.40%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.60%
EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.30%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.27%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.26%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.