PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.31%
Revenue decline while CRWV shows 23.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.84%
Cost reduction while CRWV shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.78%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.19%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 1.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.52%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-32.43%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-21.89%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWV shows 248.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-16.37%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWV shows 17.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.60%
Total costs reduction while CRWV shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.14%
Interest expense reduction while CRWV shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.51%
D&A reduction while CRWV shows 26.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.16%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWV's 33.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.63%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
18.42%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.22%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1553.33%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.13%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 9.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
22.97%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to CRWV's 26.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.50%
Tax expense growth less than half of CRWV's 3.78%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
24.02%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
26.96%
Similar net margin growth to CRWV's 25.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
24.32%
Similar EPS growth to CRWV's 23.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
24.66%
Similar diluted EPS growth to CRWV's 23.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.18%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.17%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.