PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.94%
Revenue growth 50-75% of CRWV's 23.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
29.01%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWV's 19.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.44%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.74%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.55%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1.79%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
16.92%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.90%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
18.33%
Similar total costs growth to CRWV's 18.28%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-3.06%
Interest expense reduction while CRWV shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.39%
D&A growth less than half of CRWV's 26.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
11.54%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWV's 33.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.89%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.73%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.77%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
77.42%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.72%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 9.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-1.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
28.82%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
11.30%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-4.00%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.41%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.54%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.15%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.27%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.