PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.18%
Revenue decline while CRWV shows 23.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.09%
Cost reduction while CRWV shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.77%
Gross profit decline while CRWV shows 25.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.49%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 1.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.23%
R&D change of 6.23% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
16.51%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
2.73%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-91.43%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.72%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.07%
Total costs reduction while CRWV shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.86%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
6.34%
D&A growth less than half of CRWV's 26.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-3.26%
EBITDA decline while CRWV shows 33.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.42%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.74%
Operating income decline while CRWV shows 169.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.61%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.27%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.00%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWV shows 9.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.92%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.10%
Tax expense reduction while CRWV shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.04%
Net income decline while CRWV shows 7.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.24%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.25%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.