PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.07%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.21%
Cost growth less than half of CRWV's 19.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
5.01%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.06%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.61%
R&D change of 8.61% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
18.18%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
12.67%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-109.09%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
11.37%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of CRWV's 17.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
8.05%
Total costs growth less than half of CRWV's 18.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.39%
Interest expense reduction while CRWV shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.46%
D&A growth less than half of CRWV's 26.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
3.42%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWV's 33.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.30%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.83%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.04%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
72.99%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.47%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWV's 9.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.23%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
0.07%
Net income growth below 50% of CRWV's 7.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.76%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.45%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.45%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.37%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.