PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while CRWV shows 23.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.95%
Cost reduction while CRWV shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.16%
Gross profit decline while CRWV shows 25.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.24%
Similar margin change to CRWV's 1.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-3.23%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-20.07%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-18.69%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWV shows 248.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-34.78%
Other expenses reduction while CRWV shows 19.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.74%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWV shows 17.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.70%
Total costs reduction while CRWV shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.81%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of CRWV's 1.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-29.88%
D&A reduction while CRWV shows 26.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.62%
EBITDA decline while CRWV shows 33.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.97%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 7.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.79%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.44%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
214.89%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.30%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of CRWV's 9.63%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
8.96%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 26.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.18%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
4.87%
Net income growth 50-75% of CRWV's 7.67%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
8.52%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.91%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.38%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.