PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.33%
Positive growth while CRWV shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.11%
Cost increase while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.98%
Positive growth while CRWV shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.36%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-25.51%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-16.12%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.81%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-16.98%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
15.72%
D&A growth while CRWV reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.45%
EBITDA growth while CRWV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
EBITDA margin growth while CRWV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.41%
Operating income growth while CRWV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.98%
Operating margin growth while CRWV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.07%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of CRWV's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
11.08%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWV's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.63%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.44%
Tax expense growth while CRWV reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.94%
Net income growth below 50% of CRWV's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.48%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.16%
EPS change of 12.16% while CRWV is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
11.86%
Diluted EPS change of 11.86% while CRWV is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.