PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.17%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.46%
Cost growth less than half of CRWV's 19.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
5.16%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.95%
Margin decline while CRWV shows 1.30% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.94%
R&D change of 4.94% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
8.97%
G&A growth while CRWV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
12.65%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRWV's 248.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.34%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWV's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.41%
Total costs growth less than half of CRWV's 18.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.06%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-7.53%
D&A reduction while CRWV shows 26.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.79%
EBITDA decline while CRWV shows 33.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.38%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWV shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.60%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.42%
Operating margin decline while CRWV shows 156.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-708.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.99%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWV shows 9.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWV shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.16%
Tax expense reduction while CRWV shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.27%
Net income decline while CRWV shows 7.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.95%
Net margin decline while CRWV shows 25.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.41%
EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.12%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWV shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.03%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.