PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.62%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
0.55%
Cost growth less than half of CRWV's 19.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
0.66%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.03%
Margin expansion below 50% of CRWV's 1.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.55%
R&D change of 3.55% while CRWV maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-4.72%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-3.54%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWV shows 248.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWV shows 17.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.23%
Total costs growth less than half of CRWV's 18.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.02%
Similar D&A growth to CRWV's 26.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
10.67%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWV's 33.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.98%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 7.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
1.10%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.47%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
72.77%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.85%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of CRWV's 9.63%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
6.19%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 26.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.63%
Tax expense growth 1.25-1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize strategy.
7.12%
Similar net income growth to CRWV's 7.67%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
6.45%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.10%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.12%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while CRWV shows 20.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.