503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.56%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.85%
Cost reduction while NET shows 11.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.59%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.00%
Margin expansion while NET shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.71%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 16.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.13%
Operating expenses growth less than half of NET's 7.30%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.62%
Total costs growth less than half of NET's 8.18%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
D&A reduction while NET shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-10.64%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.62%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-12.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.92%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.71%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.69%
EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.69%
Diluted EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-20.59%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-20.59%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.