PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.01%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NET's 6.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
113.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x NET's 11.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.12%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.34%
R&D reduction while NET shows 16.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.59%
G&A change of 22.59% while NET maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
36.88%
Marketing expense change of 36.88% while NET maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.43%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x NET's 7.30%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
43.13%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NET's 8.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.59%
D&A growth above 1.5x NET's 7.14%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-22.40%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.27%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.57%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.86%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.24%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.