PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.13%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
51.26%
Cost growth above 1.5x NET's 11.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-17.33%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.31%
R&D growth 50-75% of NET's 16.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.40%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x NET's 7.30%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
20.14%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NET's 8.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.38%
D&A reduction while NET shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-39.46%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-38.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.92%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.25%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.26%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.86%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.