PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.93%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NET's 6.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
32.45%
Cost growth above 1.5x NET's 11.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x NET's 5.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.61%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 16.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
48.47%
G&A change of 48.47% while NET maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
29.76%
Marketing expense change of 29.76% while NET maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.71%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x NET's 7.30%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
26.03%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NET's 8.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.57%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x NET's 7.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
9.51%
EBITDA growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.51%
Operating income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.76%
Other expenses growth while NET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.72%
Pre-tax income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.65%
Tax expense growth less than half of NET's 86.25%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.75%
Net income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.70%
EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.20%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.