PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.69%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.04%
Cost reduction while NET shows 11.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.89%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.43%
Margin expansion while NET shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.96%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 16.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
119.61%
G&A change of 119.61% while NET maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-6.99%
Marketing expense reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.73%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x NET's 7.30%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.61%
Total costs growth less than half of NET's 8.18%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.60%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x NET's 7.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-31.97%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.97%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
18.29%
Other expenses growth while NET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-29.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.03%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.56%
Net margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.58%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.79%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.