PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.41%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NET's 6.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
37.18%
Cost growth above 1.5x NET's 11.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.17%
Similar gross profit growth to NET's 5.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-5.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.31%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 16.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-6.31%
G&A reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
20.30%
Marketing expense change of 20.30% while NET maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.16%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x NET's 7.30%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
17.97%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NET's 8.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x NET's 7.14%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-1.00%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3662.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.52%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.08%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.08%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.99%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.93%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.