PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.93%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-27.98%
Cost reduction while NET shows 11.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.84%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.76%
Margin expansion while NET shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.41%
R&D reduction while NET shows 16.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
44.77%
G&A change of 44.77% while NET maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-18.60%
Marketing expense reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.71%
Operating expenses reduction while NET shows 7.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.84%
Total costs reduction while NET shows 8.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.06%
D&A growth 50-75% of NET's 7.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-25.27%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.90%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-28.17%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.71%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-28.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.79%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.79%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.