PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.02%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.10%
Cost reduction while NET shows 11.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.96%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.10%
Margin expansion while NET shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.59%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 16.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
16.29%
G&A change of 16.29% while NET maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
7.08%
Marketing expense change of 7.08% while NET maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.03%
Operating expenses growth less than half of NET's 7.30%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.06%
Total costs reduction while NET shows 8.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.56%
D&A growth less than half of NET's 7.14%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
5.18%
EBITDA growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
139.95%
Other expenses growth while NET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.27%
Pre-tax income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.56%
Pre-tax margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.24%
Tax expense growth less than half of NET's 86.25%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.28%
Net income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.57%
Net margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.03%
EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.03%
Diluted EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.10%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NET's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.63%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NET's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.