PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.37%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
9.90%
Similar cost growth to NET's 11.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-4.14%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.19%
R&D reduction while NET shows 16.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-47.03%
G&A reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-12.59%
Marketing expense reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.25%
Operating expenses reduction while NET shows 7.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.40%
Total costs reduction while NET shows 8.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.14%
D&A reduction while NET shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
16.73%
EBITDA growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.66%
EBITDA margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.42%
Operating income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.97%
Operating margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.58%
Other expenses growth while NET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.04%
Pre-tax income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.63%
Pre-tax margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.57%
Tax expense growth less than half of NET's 86.25%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
17.37%
Net income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.00%
Net margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.65%
EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.65%
Diluted EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.16%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NET's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NET's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.