PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.22%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NET's 6.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
49.27%
Cost growth above 1.5x NET's 11.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
12.15%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x NET's 5.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.80%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 16.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-3.70%
G&A reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
29.72%
Marketing expense change of 29.72% while NET maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
1350.00%
Other expenses change of 1350.00% while NET maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
13.47%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x NET's 7.30%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
26.77%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NET's 8.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.06%
Interest expense growth less than half of NET's 5.61%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.61%
D&A reduction while NET shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.90%
EBITDA growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.98%
Operating income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
137.86%
Other expenses growth while NET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.77%
Pre-tax income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.00%
Tax expense growth less than half of NET's 86.25%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
15.44%
Net income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.18%
EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.71%
Diluted EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.12%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NET's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.29%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.