PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.36%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.12%
Cost growth less than half of NET's 11.34%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-14.80%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.17%
R&D reduction while NET shows 16.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-0.79%
G&A reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-22.11%
Marketing expense reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
20.96%
Other expenses change of 20.96% while NET maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-13.03%
Operating expenses reduction while NET shows 7.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.34%
Total costs reduction while NET shows 8.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.92%
D&A reduction while NET shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
238.44%
EBITDA growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2664.58%
Operating income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3018.79%
Operating margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.33%
Other expenses growth while NET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1441.50%
Pre-tax income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1639.01%
Pre-tax margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.50%
Tax expense growth less than half of NET's 86.25%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1007.72%
Net income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1124.02%
Net margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1002.90%
EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1002.90%
Diluted EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.10%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NET's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.26%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NET's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.