PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.51%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.90%
Cost reduction while NET shows 11.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.39%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.31%
Margin expansion while NET shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.43%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 16.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
43.25%
G&A change of 43.25% while NET maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-11.95%
Marketing expense reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-142.42%
Other expenses reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.21%
Operating expenses growth less than half of NET's 7.30%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.90%
Total costs reduction while NET shows 8.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.81%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of NET's 5.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
4.36%
D&A growth 50-75% of NET's 7.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-1.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.78%
EBITDA margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.58%
Operating margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-800.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.13%
Tax expense growth less than half of NET's 86.25%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-5.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.26%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.26%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.18%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.