PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.89%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
17.03%
Cost growth above 1.5x NET's 11.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-8.97%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.42%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 16.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-26.93%
G&A reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
11.44%
Marketing expense change of 11.44% while NET maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
231.25%
Other expenses change of 231.25% while NET maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1.62%
Operating expenses growth less than half of NET's 7.30%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.35%
Similar total costs growth to NET's 8.18%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
10.09%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x NET's 5.61%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-6.65%
D&A reduction while NET shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-17.31%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
900.00%
Other expenses growth while NET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.77%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.06%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.06%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.15%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x NET's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.