PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.77%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
8.93%
Similar cost growth to NET's 11.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-5.44%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.86%
R&D reduction while NET shows 16.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-16.17%
G&A reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-20.38%
Marketing expense reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
46.97%
Other expenses change of 46.97% while NET maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-13.45%
Operating expenses reduction while NET shows 7.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.31%
Total costs reduction while NET shows 8.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.73%
Interest expense reduction while NET shows 5.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.03%
D&A reduction while NET shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.82%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.90%
EBITDA margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-10.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.99%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.79%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.82%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NET's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.07%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x NET's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.