PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.12%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.49%
Cost reduction while NET shows 11.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.47%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.27%
R&D reduction while NET shows 16.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-14.78%
G&A reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-15.85%
Marketing expense reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-2425.00%
Other expenses reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.38%
Operating expenses reduction while NET shows 7.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.65%
Total costs reduction while NET shows 8.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.81%
Interest expense growth less than half of NET's 5.61%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.14%
D&A reduction while NET shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
36306.25%
EBITDA growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
382.17%
Operating income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
407.11%
Operating margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-194.28%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
413.95%
Pre-tax income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
441.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-57.54%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
253.43%
Net income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
266.99%
Net margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
252.50%
EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
252.50%
Diluted EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.81%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.29%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NET's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.