PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.12%
Revenue decline while NET shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.59%
Cost reduction while NET shows 11.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.85%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.86%
Margin expansion while NET shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.57%
R&D growth 50-75% of NET's 16.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
36.75%
G&A change of 36.75% while NET maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-5.07%
Marketing expense reduction while NET shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
76.74%
Other expenses change of 76.74% while NET maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.10%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of NET's 7.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-7.99%
Total costs reduction while NET shows 8.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.89%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x NET's 5.61%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
13.25%
D&A growth above 1.5x NET's 7.14%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-8.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.69%
EBITDA margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
217.09%
Other expenses growth while NET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.38%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.35%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.39%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.22%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.