PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Revenue growth below 50% of NET's 6.94%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.91%
Cost growth less than half of NET's 11.34%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while NET shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.74%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 16.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
12.73%
G&A change of 12.73% while NET maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
12.50%
Marketing expense change of 12.50% while NET maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
42.50%
Other expenses change of 42.50% while NET maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
9.44%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x NET's 7.30%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
7.23%
Similar total costs growth to NET's 8.18%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
7.55%
Interest expense growth 1.25-1.5x NET's 5.61%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize debt strategy.
-4.48%
D&A reduction while NET shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-370.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-21.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-160.20%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.72%
Net income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.19%
Net margin growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.31%
EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.57%
Diluted EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.