PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.15%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x NET's 10.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
24.29%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x NET's 18.60%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
9.78%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x NET's 8.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.84%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 12.02%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
7.54%
G&A growth less than half of NET's 32.84%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
18.30%
Similar marketing expense growth to NET's 17.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
-166.67%
Other expenses reduction while NET shows 147.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
9.52%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of NET's 18.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
17.55%
Similar total costs growth to NET's 18.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-2.60%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.84%
D&A growth less than half of NET's 22.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
9.78%
EBITDA growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.93%
Operating income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.29%
Other expenses reduction while NET shows 184.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.70%
Pre-tax income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19636.84%
Tax expense growth while NET reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.49%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.11%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.58% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.58% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.