PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Similar revenue growth to NET's 6.31%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
13.18%
Cost growth above 1.5x NET's 6.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
1.70%
Gross profit growth below 50% of NET's 6.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.26%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 9.90%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
67.17%
G&A growth above 1.5x NET's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
10.79%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x NET's 7.07%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-22.58%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.99%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x NET's 8.40%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.09%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NET's 8.07%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
30.75%
D&A growth above 1.5x NET's 7.57%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-0.45%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.77%
EBITDA margin decline while NET shows 85.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.20%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-211.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.54%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 11.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.38%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.08%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.58% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.58% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.