PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.74%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NET's 5.91%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
20.37%
Cost growth above 1.5x NET's 4.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.43%
Similar gross profit growth to NET's 6.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-3.93%
Margin decline while NET shows 0.34% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.25%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 16.93%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
34.12%
G&A growth above 1.5x NET's 5.02%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
20.42%
Marketing expense growth while NET reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-23.36%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.35%
Operating expenses growth while NET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.11%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NET's 0.55%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
73.14%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x NET's 10.73%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
51.98%
D&A growth while NET reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.06%
EBITDA growth below 50% of NET's 124.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.98%
EBITDA margin decline while NET shows 269.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.51%
Operating income growth below 50% of NET's 36.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.41%
Operating margin decline while NET shows 40.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.08%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.78%
Pre-tax income decline while NET shows 58.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.40%
Pre-tax margin decline while NET shows 60.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.89%
Net income decline while NET shows 57.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.59%
Net margin decline while NET shows 59.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.00%
EPS decline while NET shows 55.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.01%
Diluted EPS decline while NET shows 55.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NET's 0.61%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x NET's 0.61%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.