PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.26%
Revenue decline while NET shows 7.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.70%
Cost reduction while NET shows 7.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.25%
Gross profit growth below 50% of NET's 7.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.52%
Margin expansion while NET shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.15%
Similar R&D growth to NET's 8.16%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-3.29%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-0.62%
Marketing expense reduction while NET shows 6.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-187.57%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.65%
Operating expenses growth less than half of NET's 5.31%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.03%
Total costs reduction while NET shows 5.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.99%
Interest expense reduction while NET shows 17.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.14%
D&A growth while NET reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.87%
EBITDA growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.42%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of NET's 49.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.03%
Operating income growth below 50% of NET's 10.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.30%
Operating margin growth below 50% of NET's 16.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-68.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.76%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of NET's 7.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of NET's 14.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.84%
Tax expense growth less than half of NET's 118.94%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.32%
Net income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of NET's 5.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.34%
EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.34%
Diluted EPS growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while NET shows 0.50% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x NET's 0.50%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.