PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.17%
Similar revenue growth to NET's 6.94%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
8.46%
Cost growth 50-75% of NET's 11.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
5.16%
Similar gross profit growth to NET's 5.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-0.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.94%
R&D growth less than half of NET's 16.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
8.97%
G&A change of 8.97% while NET maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
12.65%
Marketing expense change of 12.65% while NET maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.34%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x NET's 7.30%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
8.41%
Similar total costs growth to NET's 8.18%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
2.06%
Interest expense growth less than half of NET's 5.61%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.53%
D&A reduction while NET shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.79%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.60%
Operating income growth while NET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-708.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.16%
Tax expense reduction while NET shows 86.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.41%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.03%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NET's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while NET shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.