PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.24%
Positive growth while ORCL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.92%
Cost increase while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.62%
Positive growth while ORCL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.58%
Operating expenses growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.53%
Total costs growth while ORCL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.60%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.63%
EBITDA growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.59%
Operating income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.33%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of ORCL's 50.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
5.53%
Pre-tax income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.84%
Tax expense growth while ORCL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.05%
Net income growth while ORCL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.33%
EPS growth below 50% of ORCL's 1011.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ORCL's 1011.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-22.82%
Share count reduction while ORCL shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-22.82%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.